On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 10:57 +0530, Tamizh chelvam wrote:
>
> @@ -1626,6 +1635,14 @@ struct ieee80211_vif {
>
> bool txqs_stopped[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>
> + int noack[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + int retry_short[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + int retry_long[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + int ampdu[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + u8 rate_ctrl[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + u32 rate_code[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + u8 rtscts[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
This is quite a bit of data (176 bytes), can we make it up to the driver
to store it if supported, instead?
> @@ -2004,6 +2027,13 @@ struct ieee80211_sta {
>
> struct ieee80211_txq *txq[IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS + 1];
>
> + int noack[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + int retry_short[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + int retry_long[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + int ampdu[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + u8 rate_ctrl[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
> + u8 rtscts[IEEE80211_TID_MAX];
same here.
> +static int ieee80211_set_tid_config(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ieee80211_tid_config *tid_conf)
> +{
> + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
> + struct sta_info *sta;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!sdata->local->ops->set_tid_config)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (!tid_conf->peer)
> + return drv_set_tid_config(sdata->local, sdata, NULL, tid_conf);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sdata->local->sta_mtx);
> +
> + sta = sta_info_get_bss(sdata, tid_conf->peer);
> + if (!sta) {
> + mutex_unlock(&sdata->local->sta_mtx);
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + ret = drv_set_tid_config(sdata->local, sdata, &sta->sta, tid_conf);
> + mutex_unlock(&sdata->local->sta_mtx);
> + return ret;
> +}
and you're not actually using the data anyway?
johannes
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
