On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:15:01 +0800 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:58:52PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > Right...the condition was in-between. However, not every caller > > of dma_alloc_contiguous() is supposed to have a coherent check. > > So we either add a 'bool coherent_ok' to the API or revert the > > dma-direct part back to the original. Probably former option is > > better? > > > > Thank you for the debugging. I have been a bit distracted, may > > not be able to submit a fix very soon. Would you like to help? > > Yeah, it turns out that while the idea for the dma_alloc_contiguous > helper was neat it didn't work out at all, and me pushing Nicolin > down that route was not a very smart idea. Sorry for causing this > mess. > > I think we'll just need to open code it for dma-direct for 5.3. > Hillf do you want to cook up a patch or should I do it?
Feel free to do that, Sir. Thanks Hillf _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
