On 2019-11-11 20:23, Kalle Valo wrote:
Wen Gong <[email protected]> writes:
On 2019-11-01 15:42, Wen Gong wrote:
On 2019-10-31 17:08, Kalle Valo wrote:
、> I just realised that this is RX path so we should use
ATH10K_SKB_RXCB()
instead. I made the change below to this commit in pending branch:
I will test with the new patch together with other performance
patches.
Hi Kalle, I have tested with the patches of pending branch, it is
success.
result is same with the public review which I tested before.
the patches I tested on pending branch:
ath10k: enable alt data of TX path for sdio
ath10k: add htt TX bundle for sdio
ath10k: disable TX complete indication of htt for sdio
ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio
ath10k: sdio: remove struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data::status
ath10k: sdio: cosmetic cleanup
ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio
ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 for sdio
ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio
Very good, thanks for testing.
Hi Kalle,
this patch will trigger connect fail for PSK mode AP:
ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio
I have sent patch to fix it:
ath10k: clear ieee80211_rx_status for sdio
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
