On 2020-04-17 15:17, Kalle Valo wrote:
Wen Gong <[email protected]> writes:
On 2020-04-16 20:38, Kalle Valo wrote:
Wen Gong <[email protected]> writes:
+static inline int ath10k_hif_set_mbox_sleep(struct ath10k *ar,
bool enable_sleep)
+{
+ if (ar->hif.ops->set_mbox_sleep)
+ return ar->hif.ops->set_mbox_sleep(ar, enable_sleep);
+ return 0;
+}
I don't think we need to add another hif op for this. I sent v2 which
uses existing op.
Yes, I see it. but I see it removed ath10k_hif_set_mbox_sleep in
ath10k_core_start, expected it will not effect the patch's power save.
So the idea is that the same functionality is still there as with your
version, the callpath is just a bit different:
ath10k_core_start()
-> ath10k_hif_start_post()
-> ath10k_sdio_hif_start_post()
-> ath10k_sdio_set_mbox_sleep()
But please do double check that I didn't miss anything.
yes, I see this now, so it not miss in v2.
@@ -1749,6 +1819,8 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_hif_start_post(struct
ath10k *ar)
ar_sdio->swap_mbox = false;
}
+ ath10k_sdio_hif_set_mbox_sleep(ar, true);
+
return 0;
}
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
