On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Carl Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2020-09-28 20:36, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 13:49 +0800, Carl Huang wrote: > >> +struct cfg80211_sar_freq_ranges { > >> + u8 index; > > > > Does an index here make sense? > > > With agreement from Google, it's OK to remove it.
I'm not sure "Google" is the arbiter of the nl80211 API, even if we are the current planned users ;) But I think I agree with Johannes, that given the other plans (user space must send all bands all the time; dropping the "apply to all bands" support), an index isn't really necessary in either the user space API or the internal representation handed down to drivers. All bands should be specified, in order. Brian > >> + u32 start_freq; > >> + u32 end_freq; > >> +}; _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
