[email protected] wrote: > From: Ben Greear <[email protected]> > > This makes per-chain RSSI be more consistent between HT20, HT40, HT80. > Instead of doing precise log math for adding dbm, I did a rough estimate, > it seems to work good enough. > > Tested on ath10k-ct 9984 firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Commented out code etc so I assume this is an RFC. Has anyone tested this with upstream firmware? Patch set to RFC. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
