On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 22:55, Thibaut <ha...@slashdirt.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Le 16 févr. 2022 à 22:19, Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > On 16/02/2022 14:38, Robert Marko wrote: > >> Silent ping, > >> Does anybody have an opinion on this? > > > > As a fallback, I've cobbled together from the old scripts that > > "concat board.bin into a board-2.bin. Do this on the device > > in userspace on the fly" idea. This was successfully tested > > on one of the affected devices (MikroTik SXTsq 5 ac (RBSXTsqG-5acD)) > > and should work for all MikroTik. > > > > "ipq40xx: dynamically build board-2.bin for Mikrotik" > > <https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/chunkeey.git;a=commit;h=52f3407d94da62b99ba6c09f3663464cccd29b4f> > > (though I don't think this link will stay active for > > too long.) > > IMHO Robert’s patch addresses an actual bug in ath10k whereby the driver > sends the same devpath for two different devices when requesting board-1 BDF, > which doesn’t seem right. > > Your proposal is less straightforward than using unmodified board-1 data (as > could be done if the above bug did not occur) and negates the previous > efforts not to store this data on flash (using instead the kernel’s > documented firmware sysfs loading facility - again possible without the above > issue). > > HTH > T-Bone
Kalle, any chance of reviewing this? It just brings the board data in line with caldata as far as naming goes. Regards, Robert _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
