On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:12:46 -0700 Jeff Johnson wrote:
> NAK this based upon the ath11k patch results.

The ath11 patch is much more complex, I'd wager this one is fine.

> As suggested there we should just use kmalloc/kfree to match the existing 
> logic.

Please no. There is no magic here. alloc + free must match whether
you're using magic object alloc wrapper (alloc_netdev()) or straight
up kzalloc().

Reply via email to