On 02/04/2008 10:52 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:34 +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> On 2/4/08, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 02/04/2008 03:00 PM, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote: >>>> ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported >>>> WEXT auth param 4 value 0x0 - bind(PF_UNIX): Address already in use >>> 4 - 0x0 is TKIP, nothing we should worry about. >>> >>>> ctrl_iface exists and seems to be in use - cannot override it >>>> Delete '/var/run/wpa_supplicant/ath0' manually if it is not used anymore >>>> Failed to initialize control interface '/var/run/wpa_supplicant'. >>>> You may have another wpa_supplicant process already running or the file >>> was >>>> left by an unclean termination of wpa_supplicant in which case you will >>> need >>>> to manually remove this file before starting wpa_supplicant again. >>> Have you? >> yes
Ok, on one log it can't be bound and connected to, on the others it can be bound. I think you have 2 wpa/NM/whatever processes there which try to assign. > Note that the specific behavior of the process requesting scan results > can sometimes interact badly with the driver. The driver most likely > needs to cope with this (by caching the BSS list internally for example) > and handle whatever behavior userspace programs throw at it. The driver doesn't cope with scanning at all. It doesn't support passive scans. It's a mac layer who scans (sends probe request for each channel and listens for probe response for a while) here. The scan results as Dan mentioned will be appreciated. _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
