Hi Sandeep,

I would suggest you to use the values 0 and 127 for your thresholds to
determine if it works. The reason is if you go by 2's complement
representation, then 255 is -1 which means you are setting to adjacent
values.  So you might not see any difference.

Please try this and let me know. I'm working on a similar project where I
need to disable carrier sense, it would be of great use to me as well.

Also please tell me if you know how to build a packet and transmit a packet
within the driver, that is not processing a packet from a higher layer but
your own packet.


Thanks.
Cool Fire.


2008/3/31 Sandeep Kakumanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi,
>
>   Is it true that setting a really low AR5K_TUNE_RSSI_THRES value (0) in
> ath5k.h disables carrier sense? I find that doing so does not alter the
> behavior of my cards.
>
>   I use linksys wmp55ag PCI cards (atheros chipset 5213). My setup is as
> follows. I set two wireless networks in the same channel (5.24GHz) using
> two wireless APs. Two PCI cards on different machines using the ath5k driver
> work as clients. I send UDP traffic (iperf) from each of the clients to
> their respective APs. I get the same throughput through each network (about
> 17Mbps on either network) irrespective of the different RSSI thresholds I
> use. In particular I tried a scenario with one card having a threshold of
> 255 and the other with 0. If setting the RSSI to 0 does infact disable
> carries sense, I should be observing a higher throughput in the network with
> lower RSSI.
>
>  Is there a different way to disable CS ?
>
> thanks
> sandeep
>
> --
> Sandeep Kakumanu
> Presently doing PhD (Gatech Atlanta)
>
> http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~ksandeep/<http://users.ece.gatech.edu/%7Eksandeep/>
> _______________________________________________
> ath5k-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to