On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for catching it! Please mention rs_antenna in addition to > rs_more. > >> - rs->rs_antenna = rx_status->rx_status_0 & >> - AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_RECEIVE_ANTENNA; >> - rs->rs_more = rx_status->rx_status_0 & >> - AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_MORE; >> + rs->rs_antenna = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_0, >> + AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_RECEIVE_ANTENNA); >> + rs->rs_more = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_0, >> + AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_MORE); > > rs_more should be boolean. It would be better to use "!!" to calculate > rs_rate. No need to shift anything. As for rs_antenna, it's fine with ^^^^^^ I assume you meant rs_more again: rs_more = !!(rx_status_0 & ...)
>> +#define AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS0_DECOMP_CRC_ERROR_S 13 > > This doesn't belong to the patch. It looks like it's another boolean > value, but it's not currently used. ACK, all valid. I'll respin. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
