[Corrected Luis address] On 4/15/09, Alan Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/10/09, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks pavel, please try this patch: >> >> From 94505af850bd0961a86e2786238ac0bbe0c44615 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:07:43 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH] cfg80211: fix bug while trying to process obeacon hints >> on >> init >> >> During initialization we would not have received any beacons >> so skip processing reg beacon hints, also adds a check to >> reg_is_world_roaming() for last_request before accessing its >> fields. > > Hi again > > I'm building wireless-testing to test the rfkill-rewrite patches on > top of. I need to apply the patch referenced above as well. > > When I applied the above patch, I noticed this unrelated warning > > net/wireless/reg.c: In function ‘wiphy_update_regulatory’: > net/wireless/reg.c:1196: warning: ‘channel_after’ may be used > uninitialised in this function > net/wireless/reg.c:1196: note: ‘channel_after’ was declared here > net/wireless/reg.c:1196: warning: ‘channel_before’ may be used > uninitialised in this function > net/wireless/reg.c:1196: note: ‘channel_before’ was declared here > > Looking at the code, I think it does need fixing. There's even a > comment which says "this finds them (or not)" - and if they're not > found, channel_before / channel_after will be unset.
Um, also the new "ath" module taints the kernel ath: module 'unspecified' taints kernel. and I get a new BUG in freq_reg_info_regd. I'll send the full trace as soon as someone reassures it is welcome and wireless-testing is really intended for testing at the current time :-). Thanks Alan _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
