John W. Linville wrote:
> I think I am on the side of removing the non-standard extensions.
> FWIW, I'll need a patch posted with a proper Subject and
> Signed-off-by...
> 
> I think Nick has some valid points.  His position sounds similar to
> that expressed to me by Felix and some others that it would be nice
> if we could more easily accomodate some of the features of madwifi
> that have made it attractive to researchers and experimenters.
> Perhaps NL80211_CMD_TESTMODE relates to this desire?
Yes, that would be a good solution. I know a lot of people who are going
continue to stick with madwifi if they won't be able to use turbo mode
with ath5k. Since quite a few of those people are using OpenWrt, it
would also mean that I would have to continue to maintain my madwifi
semi-fork in OpenWrt even longer, and I definitely want to avoid that.

- Felix
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to