On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > I don't have an ath5k based card at hand. I will try to grab one and > will give an example of said frame. Basically, I followed the same > strategy for ath9k already.
Are you saying that this patch has not actually been tested at all on ath5k and it was just based on the changes you did for ath9k? If that is the case, I would suggest running the tests before actually applying this. We should really not depend on undocumented hardware behavior to remain the same between different revisions. That's why I did not like the changes in ath9k and would not exactly like extending that to even more different chips taken into account that none of this is needed for normal use of the card. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
