On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 12:30 -0400, David Willmore wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:51 AM, David Willmore > <davidwillm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 5210 is not well supported, we have various things to fix. Is it > >> usable without wpa ? > > > > That's a good question. I'll give it a shot. Would it become better > > supported if you > > had a cart to play with? I have three and I certainly don't need them > > all. Would > > someone one the development team find one useful to enhance how well they're > > supported? > > Okay, I tried with no encryption and I still cannot associate with the > AP, so I guess > there's a pretty fundamental issue here. Any pointers on where I > should continue > looking?
AR5210 doesn't seem to send or receive any packets with the current ath5k. Yet it works (somewhat) with MadWifi. Perhaps I would check mmiotrace of both and try to spot the differences. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
