On Thursday 10 June 2010 12:51:07 Bob Copeland wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:21:44AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote: > > hi bob! > > > > sounds like a good plan... do you have time to do that? > > Yeah, I started on this already, will probably have it in a day or two.
great! > > could we improve background scanning? right now it will make us loose > > packets... > > One thing we should do is implement the flush callback, or otherwise > drain the rx queue before reset yep, might be good. > (hmm, tasklet_disable() might actually > do that indirectly, I think). i dont think so. it just waits for the tasklet to finish and disables it. i was thinking, that after we disabled rx dma and the tasklets, we could make another run thru the rx desccriptors and "receive" all frames wich are still pending, before going thru the reset. but for that we would need to refactor that stuff out of the rx tasklet. bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
