Why should there be an extension channel in ath5k (agb-hardware)? In ath9k registers are there:
#define AR_2040_MODE 0x8318 #define AR_2040_JOINED_RX_CLEAR 0x00000001 Set Bit to join both channels to count up only if both channels are clear. #define AR_EXTRCCNT 0x8328 If not joined, holds the cycles for the extension channel. BR Robert -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Helmut Schaa Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2010 08:52 An: Bruno Randolf Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Betreff: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] nl80211/mac80211: Add channel utilization to survey On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Randolf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Schaa wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This adds three new values to the survey results: >> > >> > * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy >> > * BUSY_TX - percentage of time spent transmitting frames >> > * BUSY_RX - percentage of time spent receiving frames >> >> Does BUSY include BUSY_RX and BUSY_TX already? At least on >> rt2800 devices we only have access to BUSY which already includes >> BUSY_RX and TX. > > yes, BUSY includes TX and RX. > >> And what about BUSY on the secondary channel in case of 40Mhz? > > i have no information about that. luis? At least we've got a register for that in rt2800 ;) That's why I'm asking. Helmut _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
