On Tue November 16 2010 18:30:02 Stefan Nickl wrote:
> > 1.) What is your chipset revision (check in dmesg)? Mine is:
> > ath5k phy1: Atheros AR5414 chip found (MAC: 0xa5, PHY: 0x61). AR5413 and
> > AR5414 should be very similar, AFAIK.
> 
> Interestingly, I have the same chipset as you when looking at dmesg:
> ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5414 chip found (MAC: 0xa5, PHY: 0x61)
> 
> I had looked at lspci before, which identifies
> 168c:001b (rev 01) /  Subsystem: 168c:2062
> as "Atheros Communications Inc. AR5413 802.11abg NIC (rev 01)"

The ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5414 chip found (MAC: 0xa5, PHY: 0x61) line is the 
one that counts.

> > 2.) What encryption did you use? TKIP or AES (CCMP)? I tested both in STA
> > mode. I can get DHCP and i tested several minutes of high traffic. No
> > problem as far as I can see. I used wpa_supplicant v0.7.1.
> 
> I used CCMP/AES with PSK and several different APs.

Ok. I did the same (only one ath5k AP, though...).

Can you check if WPA1 (TKIP) works or not?

> The EEPROM of this module is a bit quirky, for example 11a mode (which
> is my primary target) only works with ath5k when the corresponding mode
> flag is modified after it was read from EEPROM.

Uh, then complain to your vendor ;-)

Maybe there is something in the EEPROM which disables encryption, too. There 
is a flag for this: ATH_CRYPT_CAP_CIPHER_AESCCM. Can you check if it is 
enabled in your case?

> What are the numerical PCI IDs of your device?
> Maybe detection is sent down the wrong track because of other IDs?

It is (lspci -vn)

00:0f.0 0200: 168c:001b (rev 01)
        Subsystem: 168c:2062
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 168, IRQ 5
        Memory at a0020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
        Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
        Kernel driver in use: ath5k
        Kernel modules: ath5k

But I don't think it makes a big difference. The SREV (MAC: 0xa5) is used in 
the ath5k code, not the PCI IDs.

bruno
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to