Adding Ben and Cliff just to keep them in the loop.
Note: this e-mail is on a public mailing list.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:17:43PM -0800, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 19:26 +0100, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote:
>
> > Hi Pavel, i had done some tests and did found that my SR71-12 does
> > works if I
> > change in hw.c::ath9k_hw_init_11a_eeprom_fix()...
> >
> > if ((ah->hw_version.devid == AR9280_DEVID_PCI) &&
> > test_bit(ATH9K_MODE_11A, ah->caps.wireless_modes)) {
> >
> > to...
> >
> > if (ah->hw_version.devid == AR9280_DEVID_PCI) {
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't know what that 'fix' fixes :-)
>
> You patch fixes Ubiquiti SR71-12 for me! And it looks quite reasonable.
> I'm only getting "deadbeef" from AR_IMR_S2 now, which is exactly what
> I'm getting with SR71-15.
>
> The right fix would be probably to find out when the "fixup" is actually
> needed.
>
> By the way, I'm not very fond of checking PCI ID in the driver when
> there are other ways to check for the chip revision and capabilities.
I'm baffled, why would initializing some 5 Ghz stuff be required for
a 2ghz only card. Unless hardware requires this.. we're still looking
into this.
Luis
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
