On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:27:01AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being > removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it? > > It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to > work much better), and it would likely simplify the code > a bit to have it gone.
As much as I love the funcitonality it complicates the driver, and I would welcome the rm -rf of it given that experimenters can simply use older kernels now with the virtual wiphy. Jouni, thoughts? Luis _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
