On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 28 April 2011 09:27, Larry Vaden <va...@texoma.net> wrote: > >> There is one vendor in the marketplace where if you want layer 2 >> transparency on a p-t-p link, you VILL use WDS :( > > What's broken about WDS? Just that you halve bandwidth?
WDS is like a 3 pound sledgehammer or just about anything else, good for some things, not for other things. I'm not sure WDS halves the bandwidth in all cases and I'm not sure it would do that if the links were full duplex? _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
