Antonio Quartulli wrote: > mh, at the very beginning I thought it was not correct what you said, but > indeed > we should be able to do the job in sta_rc_update(). > > But then why does the ath9k_htc driver implement ath9k_htc_update_rate() to > update the rate used to talk to the AP? Should it use sta_rc_update() as well?
We didn't have this new callback back then, and sta_rc_update() is sufficient to fix this. Maybe with a new flag - IEEE80211_RC_BASIC_RATES_CHANGED. Sujith _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
