On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Ali Abedi <a2ab...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am writing this response to my own question since I have found a
> workaround for this problem and this may help others as well.
> So the problem is that if you have an interface wlan0 in managed mode
> and then add another interface wlan1 in monitor mode it lowers your
> outgoing throughput. It does not affect the incoming traffic though. The
> trick is to add the monitor interface wlan1 then remove wlan0 by using
> "iw dev wlan0 del" and then create wlan0 again. This way the incoming
> and outgoing traffic is not affected by the monitor interface. This can
> be caused by a bug in the driver. Those folks who know more about this
> part of the driver may figure out what is going on after seeing this
> solution.

sure, lets take a look at this(new year). if its a straight forward one
we should go ahead and fix it.

>
> Best,
> Ali
>
> On 23/10/2012 3:06 PM, Ali Abedi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I asked this question once before but didn't get a satisfying answer. In
>> our experiments, with two laptops running Ath9k driver we get about 29
>> Mbps bandwidth (802.11g configuration  + UDP traffic), but when the
>> monitor mode interface is enabled on the sender the throughput drops to
>> 25 Mbps. This is not a performance issue. The performance is unaffected
>> if monitor mode interface is enabled on the receiver (no monitor
>> interface on sender). I really appropriate your answer.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ali Abedi
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel



-- 
thanks,
shafi
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to