On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:26:13PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luca Coelho <l...@coelho.fi> writes:
> 
> > From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com>
> >
> > The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> > be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> > ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> > removes them.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> > replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> > iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)
> 
> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

-- 
John W. Linville                Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linvi...@tuxdriver.com                  might be all we have.  Be ready.
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to