Thanks. Yes, Channel State Information (CSI) is absolutely worthy if available, but I am not sure how to access it. Please update me if you find any information from the baseband guys
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think the easiest thing to do is control that at the sending side. > > I think maybe the channel quality stuff may have some per-stream > carrier information? I'll have to ask the baseband guys. But IIRC, it > won't help you. > > > -a > > > On 10 June 2014 00:26, mahaveer gupta <mgupta1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I meant tx-chain mask, With 2x2 stream, I would like to measure > the > > channel between all tx-rx antenna pairs (4 pairs in this case). So, I > need > > to explicitly set tx-chain mask and measure rssi values from one antenna. > > Then change the tx-chain mask and measure rssi values corresponding to > the > > other antenna. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Sujith Manoharan <suj...@msujith.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> mahaveer gupta wrote: > >> > Actually, Is there another way to pull out individual RSSI values from > >> > individual antennas. which is what I am actually interested in. > >> > > >> > One alternative I can think of is to set the rx-chain-mask to 1 and 2 > to > >> > get > >> > the RSSI from antenna 0 and 1 respectively. Wondering if this should > >> > give > >> > reliable estimates > >> > >> The RSSI values are obtained for each packet, for all active chains, > >> for both the control and extension channels. Why do you need another way > >> to get this information ? > >> > >> Sujith > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > M > -- Thanks, M
_______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
