On 2015-06-22 13:59, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 13:58 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 13:43 +0200, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: >> > mac80211 configure rxfilter per HW, >> > so we don't need this per channel. >> >> As I said before, I think there's value in mac80211 doing it per chanctx >> or even per vif, and it should be more efficient to do so. >> >> It's tempting to do it per vif and leave the chanctx work up to the >> driver, but perhaps with CSA and all that it gets complicated enough >> that doing it per chanctx in mac80211 would make sense? > > On the other hand, I think our device requires it per vif, so we'd > probably have to do both. > > +Andrei, who was looking into this. There's value in it, but I think it makes more sense to fix this bug now, and rework the code again later when mac80211 has support for per-vif or per-chanctx rxfilter.
- Felix _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
