Hi Kalle, On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> writes: > >> Julian Calaby <julian.cal...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> This is a set of all patches in patchwork which were pending when the 4.6 >>> merge window opened that meet the following criteria: >>> >>> 1. They're sane >>> 2. They're either obviously correct, I can review them, or they've been >>> reviewed or ACK'd by someone else. >>> 3. They don't require any code changes to make them applyable. >>> >>> That said, if anyone doesn't like any of these patches for any reason, >>> just give me a reason and I'll drop it. >>> >>> I've split the pending patches into 4 sets as detailed below. All patches >>> have been rebased to apply in order on wireless-drivers-next at >>> wireless-drivers-next-for-davem-2016-03-14. >> >> Thank you for working on this, this is very helpful. >> >> I have deferred patch 14 and dropped patch 19[1], the rest I'm planning >> to apply soon. I also tried to remove the original patches from deferred >> queue by moving them to state "superseded", but I might missed >> something.
I'll check that later and give you a list of patchwork URLs for anything you missed. >> [1] Oddly I cannot find patch 19 from patchwork, I don't know what >> happened to it. I do see it on the mailing list, though. > > Actually another nacked patch 16 also has disappeared from patchwork, so > I'm not going to apply that either. I'm starting to wonder that maybe > you removed these yourself from patchwork? I did do that: I updated both to "Rejected" when people NACKed them. Should I not have done that? I thought I was making things easier for you. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
