On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is everybody here on board with reducing that by 2 orders of > magnitude? Yes! > I'm not posting all these results and all the flent data > just to amuse myself... The size of the potential patch set for > softmac devices has declined considerably - codel.h and the fq code > are now generalized in some tree or another, and what's left is in two > competing patches under test... one that leverages rate control stats > and wins like crazy, the other, dql, and takes longer to win like > crazy. > I'm really hoping to be able to use this. Wifi is the last buffer-bloated part of my home network (the latency differences between wired and wireless are an order of magnitude apart). And as for multiple STAs per AP: That's the norm, these days. My house might be a bit extreme, but we have 8 STAs in 5GHz, and one lowly printer in 2.4GHz (which is too far for 5GHz to get to, and I haven't run a cable to that end of the house yet as I hate crawlspaces). -Aaron
_______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
