Bill de hÓra wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
Yeah I know it's been then longer, but the -05 draft is the current one
that we're focusing on. The analogy is fine so long as we clarify the
collection-of-collections issue
Ok, it should be straightforward to decide:
Do not allow the APP to describe nested collections:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceNoCollectionsInsideCollections
+1 because we simply ain't gonna need it. If someone wants to do this
kind of thing, more power to them, but in the core, nested collections
are just silly.
- James
