Tim Bray wrote:
On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:
On 10/15/05, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A major omission from both drafts is the pub:control stuff. That's
going to be critical for a lot of stuff.
The pub:control stuff was defined over the objections lots of folks,
PacePubControl was rejected, mostly because of disagreements about
the payload, but I believe we did have consensus on
(a) a wrapper for this stuff being appropriate
right, this was pub:control
(b) a boolean <draft>yes|no</draft>
yes
(c) a boolean <significant>yes|no</draft>
I don't believe we had consensus on this yet
If others disagree I can go dig through the archives, but I'm pretty
sure. -Tim
