On 10/15/05, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: > > > On 10/15/05, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> A major omission from both drafts is the pub:control stuff. That's > >> going to be critical for a lot of stuff. > >> > > > > The pub:control stuff was defined over the objections lots of folks, > > PacePubControl was rejected, mostly because of disagreements about > the payload, but I believe we did have consensus on > > (a) a wrapper for this stuff being appropriate > (b) a boolean <draft>yes|no</draft> > (c) a boolean <significant>yes|no</draft> > > If others disagree I can go dig through the archives, but I'm pretty > sure. -Tim
PaceCollectionControl is marked as accepted: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/AtomPubIssuesList -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
