Eric Scheid wrote:
Ugh.. there is no reason at all why it needs to be stretched out that long. I'd say April 06/May 06 at the latest. That gives us six months to get our act together.On 22/10/05 11:08 PM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Oct 06 Request Last Call for Atom editing protocol Nov 06 Submit Atom editing protocol to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard+1 if you put your name to this. e.
