Referring to XOXO, On 10/27/05, Luke Arno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We get the added benefit of our documents having > meaning in other contexts. Like existing search engines.
I'm not sure that this is a a strong argument for XOXO. Interesting and useful introspection data is going to be hyperlinked and crawable, whether it is in XHTML or XML format. Someone who wants their feeds crawled will ensure that the traversal happens either way. Having a declared MIME document type (vs. being embedded in XHTML) would seem to make it much easier for a crawl to identify the content for what it is. Am I missing something about XOXO that makes it more crawl-friendly? Or did you mean something else by "search engine contexts"? -- Kyle
