On 29/10/05 2:36 AM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if my implementation supports photo edits and needs incremental
> backups, why couldn't I do:
>
> <x1:photo-edits>
> <x2:do-filter />
> <x3:save />
> <x2:do-resize />
> <x3:save />
> <x1:do-crop />
> <x3:save />
> <x2:do-filter />
> <x3:save />
> </x1:photo-edits>
Indeed. But would you also execute x3:tidy from this wrapper?
<x4:xxxxxx-xxxxx>
<x5:hCardify />
<x5:XFNify />
<x3:tidy />
</x4:xxxxxx-xxxxx>
I've used opaque xxxxxx-xxxxx there on purpose, btw. Consider that wrapper
to be an unknown extension. It could be a x4:microformats wrapper, or it
could be x4:previously-executed-history wrapper (with that extension
defining the contents as a history of previous edits, and not edits to be
actually executed).
e.
