On 1/11/05 1:04 PM, "Luke Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Not only do I think that we can deal in valid entries, I
>>> strongly believe that we need *no* extensions for the
>>> core protocol.
>>
>> A Pace with camera ready copy that explains
>> the disposition of atom:link and atom:id on a POST
>> would be most appreciated.
>>
>
> That is a tall order and I think it requires some
> discussion as to how. :-)
>
> I would like to start with atom:id.
>
> [many questions]
you left out
should there be a way for the client to defer
setting the id to the server? if so, how?
e.
