I was actually going to take a look at proposing some better language for this, just hadn't been able to get to it yet. My preference for now would be to remove the existing text for now and have this as an open issue.
Joe Gregorio wrote:
-1 What's the point of having app:member-type if you're going to ignore it. -joe On 11/1/05, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:+1-joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
