<co-chair-mode>
There are a flurry of Paces, and there is enough camera-ready spec
text supporting all the options that we believe that they are well-
understood by the group.
For a good introduction, see Rob Sayre's note at http://www.imc.org/
atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg02834.html
The co-chairs feel that WG consensus in favor of hierarchical
drilldown or date-ranges is unlikely. That leaves the other two
options, which, it seems, are sort of independent. That leaves the
WG with two choices to make:
1. Should we use URI templates? (the current draft only has {index},
and it seems unlikely that we could get consensus on anything more
ambitious).
2. Should we have prev/next pointers in collections to allow clients
to page through?
On the face of it, it seems like all four possible outcomes are
plausible.
- No templates, no paging
- Templates but no paging
- No templates but paging
- Both templates and paging
Would WG members please record their +/- 1's, or variations thereof,
on questions #1 and #2 above, so we can establish which way we are
generally leaning and try to establish consensus.
</co-chair-mode>
