2006/2/22, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-08.txt
> 9. Contradictory requirements. each entry in the feed document *MUST* > have an atom link element. But media collection entries MAY (section > 8.3.2) and entry collections MAY (section 8.2). Which is it? I'd say the MAY, as Appendix C lists PaceEditLinkMustToMay. > 9.1 Editorial. First sentence is duplication of first sentence of section 9 > > 12 Example still busted (see section 8.3.2 comments above) > > 13 Should support http basic authentication, not just digest. I'll > submit a Pace. I'd also add: 7.2.4, « "entry" - Indicates the collection contains only member resources whose representation MUST be an Atom Entry. » Must there be a single representation? (which then must be an Atom entry) This would prevent using Multipart/Related. On the other hand, as there must be an Atom Entry representation (because collections use Atom Feed representations), then what's the difference with a Media collection ? (apart from the fact that a resource in a Media collection might not have an "individual" Atom Entry representation, only one in the Atom Feed representation of the Media collection) -- Thomas Broyer
