James M Snell wrote: > Hey John, > > Overall I'm +1 on what PaceAuthentication is looking to do, but I think > the PaceBasicAuthentication I just submitted today is a bit of a cleaner > approach... mainly given that it's only a minimal change to the existing > text.
Don't worry worry about the existing text. The security section is far from adequate and I expect will see major rework as the security model gets designed out. cheers Bill
