what Alex says makes sense to me.
Henry
On 2 Mar 2006, at 22:46, Aleksander Slominski wrote:
Exactly what I've been saying all along. I'm not going to make this
argument any more. Let's just get media collections fixed so that
they're basically usable and not-confusing and leave it at that.
why metadata for media collection entries should not be editable?
i see lot of value in ability to attach metadata to media entries
and be
able to edit it (for start tagging/categories for images).
this capability would be consistent for both media and entry
collections
if atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"edit"] points to place where atom:entry can be
edited
and new relation is used to point where to PUT/DELETE binary data
(like
rel="mediaedit"). what was mentioned before rel="edit" with type
<>"application/atom+xml" seems to be harder and implies that multiple
representations are possible - which one would be main media
representation ...
thanks,
alek
--
--- Memorable Quote from Firefly (105. Out Of Gas)
-Ship like this, be with you until you die -That's because it's a
deathtrap
