Tim Bray wrote:
>
> I'm really happy to see all the interop testing and clients & servers
> popping up. Neither Paul nor I are very eager to try to bring the
> process to a close while this progress is happening, but at some point
> we'll have to.
>
> It looks to me like there's an easy change pending in required response
> body to a POST, although I don't think any of the Paces have the wording
> quite right. I'll try a draft myself.
>
Yep.
> Also, I hear repeated implementor complaints about media collections.
> [Since my site has 1,114 pictures and a few movies at the moment, this
> is something I care about :) ] There are a few Paces in play, it would
> be great if the implementors were to converge on some edit that would
> reduce/eliminate the Media-collection pain. Have they, while I wasn't
> looking?
>
There are a couple of paces out there that i did (e.g.
PaceFixMediaCollecions, etc) but I'm not sure where the WG stands on those.
> Finally, where do we stand on categories? Have any of the implementors
> pulled something together category handling and established what The
> Right Way to do it is? Are there proposals for APP changes based on
> this experience?
>
No proposals on the table that I can see. Dave J. had mentioned
something about prototyping something but I haven't seen anything come
through yet.
- James
