Re: Fixing Media Collections once and for all

[Eric Scheid]

On 25/4/06 3:16 AM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom";>
>     <title>Atom-Powered Robots Run Amok</title>
>     <id>urn:uuid:1225c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80da344efa6a</id>
>     <updated>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</updated>
>     <author><name>John Doe</name></author>
>     <content>Some text.</content>
>     <link rel="edit" href="http://example.org/edit/first-post.atom"; />
>     <link rel="enclosure"
>           href="http://example.org/media/img123.png"; />
>     <link rel="edit-enclosure"
>           href="http://example.org/edit/img123.png"; />
>   </entry>

first up, where did <content>Some text.</content> come from (other than
sloppy copy/paste from the posting the entry example ;-)

so, assuming that it couldn't be there, we then have this:

RFC 4287 #4.1.2 sez

    atom:entry elements that contain no child atom:content element MUST
    contain at least one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of
    "alternate".

so ... instead of atom:enclosure, maybe use atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'alternate']?

e.