On 6/6/06, Michael Wechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi I guess one could consider the introspection document as a published API. From the most recent draft (0.8) it is not clear to me if an introspection document has a version (7.1 Example) or how else will backwards/forwards compatibility handled in the case of the introspection?
Do we need verbage like that of Section 6.2 in the Format spec? "" The Atom namespace is reserved for future forward-compatible revisions of Atom. Future versions of this specification could add new elements and attributes to the Atom markup vocabulary. Software written to conform to this version of the specification will not be able to process such markup correctly and, in fact, will not be able to distinguish it from markup error. For the purposes of this discussion, unrecognized markup from the Atom vocabulary will be considered "foreign markup". "" -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
