2006/6/13, Andreas Sewe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
John Panzer wrote: > +0.9 > > Caveat and reason for the -0.1: I think the wording needs to be fixed up > to account for multiple potential media resources for a single media > link entry, or outlaw them. Please don't outlaw them; there are legitimate use cases for multiple media entries.
Multiple *resources* for a single "media link entry"? are you sure? Weren't you rather thinking of multiple "editable" *representations* of a *single* resource (for a single "media link entry")? -- Thomas Broyer
