Lisa Dusseault wrote:
(Personally I feel it's a mistake not to require servers to store extension elements. Yes, it's work for the server, but think of how this could be used in 10 years if it's as successful as I suspect it will be. Many conceivable extensions can work between clients, with no new code required on servers, provided the server faithfully stores and provides the extension data as part of the feed/entry.)
Speculation: a key (har har) reason impls will tend to drop extensions is due to RDBMS storage. Anyone got a good mysql schema for key/value pairs fk'd to an Entry table?
cheers Bill
