2006/7/5, Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/5/06, Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Conclusion: content negotiation needs to be (explicitly) discussed in the
spec.
Should we explicitly discuss ETags? and gzip compression? and
Cache-Control? These are all things that will affect implementations
and are adequately covered by RFC2616.
Why are people asking so?
-1
That's not what you said here:
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05109.html
"Right now the spec does not forbid using the same URI for both
the media and the meta-data. I think adding language to force the
two to be different URIs would be over specification, but maybe we
need to add text that warns client implementors to carefully set their
Accept: headers?"
That's the purpose of this Pace.
--
Thomas Broyer
