James M Snell wrote:
== Proposal ==
{{{
8.6 Editing members and the atom:updated element
Upon successfully processing an update request on a member resource
or linked media resource, a server MAY modify the value of the members
atom:updated element. The choice of whether or not to modify the
value of atom:updated is an implementation choice that is dependent on
whether or not the server considers the update to be significant.
}}}
I would expect the server to maintain the atom:updated element when
a client updates the entry via a PUT on the "edit" relation link.
That doesn't seem to be in the 09 draft anywhere.
This language is a positive step in that direction. It doesn't
say that I can't PUT an entry with an updated time of before the
entry was created or some date in the future.
--Alex Milowski
