2006/7/6, Bill de hÓra:
Thomas Broyer wrote: > Your Pace is incomplete (no mention of the cardinalities of the > app:title element wrt xml:lang). I'm not fussed about how often a specific xml:lang value appears in a group of titles. I'll wager most code will just pick the first one it finds in document order if we don't say anything.
With or without talking about xml:lang, the Pace does not say how many app:title you could have in an app:workspace or app:collection element: zero or one? exactly one? zero, one or many? at least one? The spec text is not precise enough, and the RelaxNG schema is not updated to help readers understand...
> Plus, Atom (RFC4287) does not allow multiple atom:title, atom:summary, > atom:content or any other language sensitive construct. I see your point, but it's not an RFC4287 document. The app:title elem is in the http://purl.org/atom/app# namespace.
Yep, but there's still an Atom in it, be it Atom Syndication Format or Atom Publishing Protocol ;-) I'd expect some homogeneity… As a reader not having participating in their elaboration, I would find it /bizarre/ if a common WG (AtomPub) used two different approaches when designing their XML formats… -- Thomas Broyer
