On Tuesday, November 2, 2004, at 05:27 PM, Eric Scheid wrote:
The format has no business classifying spelling mistakes.with examples of spelling fixes that I think clearly would and would
not warrant altering atom:modified (with or without this Pace), and
asserting that it is within the spec's scope to include such examples.
Of course, if the decision of whether or not to alter atom:modified is
up to the publisher, as I'd like it to be, some publishers will chose
to alter it for trivial spelling fixes. And just like they would if
they wrote meaningless titles, those who do will degrade the quality of
their feeds.
you meant atom:updated, right?
Oops. Yes, I did.
