steve jenson wrote:
On Nov 4, 2004, at 4:19 PM, Eric Scheid wrote:
On 5/11/04 8:50 AM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't follow your logic. I would just ignore hits from referrers I don't care about.
referrers?
what are the expected uses of the Referer header with this thing?
the Pace describes use of a 410 GONE response once the error had been fixed
... is it proper http behaviour to vary the response (200 OK vs 410 GONE)
for a given specific URI according to the Referer header value?
That's not what the Pace says. The Pace says you can change the ErrorURI for a given feed whenever you want. I would probably change the value of the of the ErrorURI every time the feed was generated.
Robert Sayre
